Tuesday, 26 April 2011

The retained blood of Pope John Paul goes on display in the Vatican.

Fully paid up Catholics are so extremely weird don't you think?! (As are Muslims and Jews - but let's stick with this Christian sect for the moment.) What the hell is this all about when "in truth" it's only the soul that matters, not the body? 

Somebody tell me - when did this Catholic relic industry kick off - the retrieved hair, the nail clippings ..... and now blood of ex pontiffs?!

Anyway here's an idea which I offer at no extra charge to "Vatican Relic Company & Son Limited": how about going the whole distance and make black pudding (a traditional English sausage made from blood) wafers of it and offer to communicants in transubstantiation of John Paul's body on special occasions. If that sounds weird it's no weirder and no more cannibalistic than the miracle of the transubstantiation of the body of Christ! 
Catholics really ought to get a grip, look at themselves in the mirror and seek psychiatric help! Idiocy in numbers - apparent normality - is no justification or excuse for such errant behaviour!



http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/26/pope-john-paul-blood-vatican

Thursday, 17 February 2011

Some would self-deprecate "Self"

A friend of mine in Facebook commented just now that she has "....decided that the self does not exist and thus I do not exist and therefore I do not need to do the essay" for her uni assignment.

I replied to her (and yes, I am repeating myself!) - The very fact that she (and Susan Blackmore for that matter who really does believe there is no self!) has mused and come to the conclusion that "self" does not exist, means in reality that it does! The self surely cannot dispute that it does not exist unless the self actually does! What or who is being tricked into a feeling of "self" if it is not the self?! In my opinion, this is the only occurrence of a "proof" of absence that actually implies a proof of presence. Where else other than in the nascent science of consciousness would such a crazy enigma arise!

This situation smacks of quantum mechanics, where a particle can be both present and absent at a specific location at the same time. This is yet another reason why I think the enigma of inanimate matter becoming animate then evolving into a state of exquisite self-reflectiveness must surely be mediated by the equally non-intuitive process of quantum mechanics! This idea is poo-poo'd by leading neurologists and brain scientists keen not to appear crazy to their peers - but they'll all be dead soon, and the "young turks" can pick up the baton and not be afraid to think laterally
.

Overpowered by a feeling of senseless lack of purpose in life?

Underlying the fervour of religious faith is the "horror" of reality - that which cannot be addressed for fear of being overpowered by a feeling of senseless lack of purpose in life.

But nothing could be more senseless than believing in a "loving" god who: (i) gives us free will and original sin then commands us to do what he wants us to, or else be commited to an eternity of hell, and, (ii) also has sex with his own mother to father himself then prays to himself because he can't remember why he forsook himself as he sacrifices himself to himself to save us from the sin that he originally condemned us to!

Oh - those alarm bells they resound so loudly. And yet they are all too readily ignored by those who want/need to remain informed by and remain in the comfortable arms of cherry-picked biblical passages. Oh the joyous bliss - ignoring the fact of course that had they been born in another country with different religious traditions, their current beliefs would be anathema.

Bertrand Russel said: "There is something feeble and a little contemptible about a man who cannot face the perils of life without the help of comfortable myths. Almost inevitably some part of him is aware that they are myths and that he believes them only because they are comforting. But he dares not face this thought! Moreover, since he is aware, however dimly, that his opinions are not rational, he becomes furious when they are disputed."

If we could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people! But I simply like to get this off my chest occasionally!

Saturday, 15 January 2011

Machine Intelligence. The "Hard" and the "Easy" problem of Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The physicist Michio Kaku in a recent video describing how one might devise a sophisticated means of "machine intelligence" makes no mention of the competing "Easy" versus "Hard" AI problems. Some researchers don't even recognise that there is a "Hard" problem - maybe Michio is one of these. But consideration of both these opposing views is central to a fully rounded research into the possibility of imbuing a machine with real consciousness and more to the point, free will.

Thomas Huxley, English biologist (1825-1895) remarked: "How it is that anything so remarkable as a state of consciousness comes about as the result of irritating nervous tissue, is just as unaccountable as the appearance of the Djin when Aladdin rubbed his lamp!" This is the "Hard" Problem!

By the way, more Huxley quotations here: http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Thomas_H._Huxley

Michio however only addresses the view of the "mechanists" who with no expertise in quantum mechanics take the soft option, the "Easy" AI research route, believing they can have the consciousness problem sown up simply by mirroring sufficient neurones in the human brain, one by one with transistors in the robot's head, as if this is going to conjure up an equivalent and true self awareness. These researchers are adherents of the Susan Blackmore point of view that there is simply no such thing as self-awareness or free will - and that we are being duped into a false sense of knowing "who" we are, and "where" we are, and "what" we are doing. But the question then arises "Who or what is being duped?!" It is in the penumbra of this question that the "no consciousness / no free will" argument fails in my opinion. Indeed if a conscious entity is not involved, then who or what (and by what process) has just formulated and presented THIS conundrum right here, now, weighing the pros and cons of: consciousness as reality, or, zombiism as reality? I do not buy into the philosophical concept that all we have to do in order to be "aware" is simply to present an outward appearance of it to others! Claptrap and lazy science.

It is probable that the scientist who will stun the world with a true understanding of consciousness and how it's "emergence" actually occurs, has already been born. I do hope so! In truth this will be a more fundamental discovery than Newton's Principle of Gravitational Attraction or Einstein's Theory of General Relativity.

One thing I feel sure about is that consciousness will be found to be underpinned fundamentally by quantum mechanics, relying on a reversely directed then a forwards directed looped-flow of information. Back and forth, again and again and again - in other words, a temporal looping of information on a cyclic timescale of milliseconds or even seconds. I suspect this to be highly likely on account of recent brain scan experiments which demonstrate that the brain is "subconsciously aware" of a choice being made some six seconds before the act of "conscious awareness" of the decision. Extraordinary, but apparently true. Up until recently this lag effect was observed experimentally by other researchers to be less than a second. But whichever is actually true, the significance is the same.

So - bottom line alternatives:
(i) If NO temporal looping of information takes place in the brain, then there can only be one interpretation of the brain scan experimental results - that we have no self-will - that there is no such thing as self-awareness, and that we are zombies.
(ii) If temporal looping DOES take place then we are not zombies, because then the six second subconscious precognition effect can be explained by the "conscious decision" signal being fed back in time by a property of quantum mechanics, the counter-intuitive nature of which is crucial to this "information time travel" effect taking place.

It is inconceivable that self awareness would not involve an informational feedback loop to set up an observational resonance. This would amount to a temporal recursive process (in mathematical terms: a recursive equation in which the mathematical value of the expression to the right of the equal sign feeds back to the left side of the equal sign for the next recursion of the equation) which would manifest itself as a complex system - out of which typically, an emergent property would arise - which in this case would be consciousness.

And thus, the requirement of a significant reverse temporal looping to explain the observed ubiquitous timing mismatch of subconscious and conscious awareness, is totally consistent and gratifyingly not unexpected!

So - before we can imbue a machine with consciousness, that genius person out there somewhere is going to have to do his/her stuff first, and wow us with his/her maths and scientific rigour! The expected scientific paradigm shift will then occur and we will all start saying to each other "Well - why didn't we see that before - seems so obvious now it has been pointed out!" Only then will we be ready to imbue machines with the capacity for true self-awareness. But how would we know that we had been successful? Outwardly the intelligence might be there but there would be no way to prove the machine is actually aware of itself. Capacity is the operative word because none of us can be sure that anyone but ourselves (let alone a machine) is actually self-aware. There are of course tell-tale outward signs e.g. emotional responses, signs of pain and distress, but we would all have to be the "me" of everybody else to prove absolutely that others were conscious like ourselves. This is the enigma of consciousness.



I ramble on so!


Monday, 10 January 2011

Why I posted that picture of Sarah P on Facebook.


  • Someone, who shall remain nameless, is missing the point in my Facebook Sarah Palin thread this evening. There should be only one agenda here (the Tucson atrocity) but I see this is also becoming a vehicle for women's rights - a cause that is close to my heart - as the antagonist in this thread here knows full well.


    This was kicked off by the Tucson shootings - in the wake of Sarah Palin's and the Republican media's toxic "target" and "shoot them down" metaphorical call to arms these past months.

    This feeble-minded woman, Sarah Palin, has exploited her sexuality and good looks to inveigle herself into the minds and souls of what threatens to be a majority of American voters and so threatens to become the next President of the United States.

    Think about it! If you have ever witnessed her trying to acquit herself under close questioning on TV you'll know what I mean - AND YET - a huge section of the American public still adore her and dream of her presidential inauguration. It is frightening beyond belief - because - well correct me if I'm wrong - shoot me down and call me a cretin - for a start, she will become the Commander in Chief of the most powerful military machine in the world! And would also become the most easily manipulated puppet ever in the hands of well-known right-wing groups. If there is any glimmer of hope that has emerged from this appalling tragedy, it is that at last the odds of Sarah Palin become president will have surely dipped below 50/50! But why did it have to come to this?!

    You know, ****, that I am as anti-patriarchy as anyone you are ever ever ever likely to meet - which is one of the principal reasons why I am vociferously anti-Holy See and Church of Islam. Do you honestly think this woman has drawn the attention of a large swathe of the American public by flaunting her mind? - nope - to the men it has been her booty and to the women simply the thought that a woman - any woman, could become president. I so want that latter eventuality to come to pass! Sarah Palin's inauguration will set back the equal rights for women cause decades.


Sunday, 9 January 2011

Palin now in the cross hairs!



As a friend of mine quite rightly pointed out, Sarah Palin is all about externalities. 
Seems that her internal ethical/moral compass is completely missing. She seems to think that if she looks good and has a great rack, the utter vapidity of her mind will be ignored, and sadly, that is the case for a vast majority of American man and a lot of women.

Thursday, 6 January 2011

String Theory Rules or What?

String  theory - well I'm a mere bystander when it comes to this leading edge stuff!
[Excuse all the Wikipedia links but they are so very useful]
It was the Kalusa-Klein theory in the 1920s attempting to unify gravity and electromagnetism  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaluza-Klein_theory that set the whole string theory ball rolling - a very clever development. It's mathematical beauty drew attention.

I think there's alot going for string theory, but Loop Quantum gravity, which does not require a multiplicity of dimensions, is hot on it's tail:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loop_quantum_gravity
Something tells me though that a mutiplicity of dimensions is correct. But there is another phenomenon that might explain alot which was first popularised in Michael Talbot's book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holographic_Universe#The_Holographic_Universe and may also be critically involved in how consciousness (inanimate matter becoming animate and ultimately aware of itself, which I think is the most extraordinary emergent phenomenon of the universe!) is generated.

There is also this genius guy Bekinstein: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekenstein_bound
who has come to the conclusion from a thermodynamical point of view that in order for the information in the universe not to exceed a maximum theoretical value - and this is also bound up with black hole physics (there are billions of black holes in the universe) it is likely that the universe is in truth a hologram! String theory may still hold but the apparent dimensions may be reduced by being resolved onto the "holographic plane".

Here is Marcus Chown's recent take on the subject in New Scientist.

NEW SCIENTIST ARTICLE: Our world may be a giant hologram:

15 January 2009 by Marcus Chown
DRIVING through the countryside south of Hanover, it would be easy to miss the GEO600 experiment. From the outside, it doesn't look much: in the corner of a field stands an assortment of boxy temporary buildings, from which two long trenches emerge, at a right angle to each other, covered with corrugated iron. Underneath the metal sheets, however, lies a detector that stretches for 600 metres.

For the past seven years, this German set-up has been looking for gravitational waves - ripples in space-time thrown off by super-dense astronomical objects such as neutron stars and black holes. GEO600 has not detected any gravitational waves so far, but it might inadvertently have made the most important discovery in physics for half a century.

For many months, the GEO600 team-members had been scratching their heads over inexplicable noise that is plaguing their giant detector. Then, out of the blue, a researcher approached them with an explanation. In fact, he had even predicted the noise before he knew they were detecting it. According to Craig Hogan, a physicist at the Fermilab particle physics lab in Batavia, Illinois, GEO600 has stumbled upon the fundamental limit of space-time - the point where space-time stops behaving like the smooth continuum Einstein described and instead dissolves into "grains", just as a newspaper photograph dissolves into dots as you zoom in. "It looks like GEO600 is being buffeted by the microscopic quantum convulsions of space-time," says Hogan.

If this doesn't blow your socks off, then Hogan, who has just been appointed director of Fermilab's Center for Particle Astrophysics, has an even bigger shock in store: "If the GEO600 result is what I suspect it is, then we are all living in a giant cosmic hologram."

The idea that we live in a hologram probably sounds absurd, but it is a natural extension of our best understanding of black holes, and something with a pretty firm theoretical footing. It has also been surprisingly helpful for physicists wrestling with theories of how the universe works at its most fundamental level.

The holograms you find on credit cards and banknotes are etched on two-dimensional plastic films. When light bounces off them, it recreates the appearance of a 3D image. In the 1990s physicists Leonard Susskind and Nobel prizewinner Gerard 't Hooft suggested that the same principle might apply to the universe as a whole. Our everyday experience might itself be a holographic projection of physical processes that take place on a distant, 2D surface.

The "holographic principle" challenges our sensibilities. It seems hard to believe that you woke up, brushed your teeth and are reading this article because of something happening on the boundary of the universe. No one knows what it would mean for us if we really do live in a hologram, yet theorists have good reasons to believe that many aspects of the holographic principle are true.

Susskind and 't Hooft's remarkable idea was motivated by ground-breaking work on black holes by Jacob Bekenstein of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel and Stephen Hawking at the University of Cambridge. In the mid-1970s, Hawking showed that black holes are in fact not entirely "black" but instead slowly emit radiation, which causes them to evaporate and eventually disappear. This poses a puzzle, because Hawking radiation does not convey any information about the interior of a black hole. When the black hole has gone, all the information about the star that collapsed to form the black hole has vanished, which contradicts the widely affirmed principle that information cannot be destroyed. This is known as the black hole information paradox.

Bekenstein's work provided an important clue in resolving the paradox. He discovered that a black hole's entropy - which is synonymous with its information content - is proportional to the surface area of its event horizon. This is the theoretical surface that cloaks the black hole and marks the point of no return for infalling matter or light. Theorists have since shown that microscopic quantum ripples at the event horizon can encode the information inside the black hole, so there is no mysterious information loss as the black hole evaporates.

Crucially, this provides a deep physical insight: the 3D information about a precursor star can be completely encoded in the 2D horizon of the subsequent black hole - not unlike the 3D image of an object being encoded in a 2D hologram. Susskind and 't Hooft extended the insight to the universe as a whole on the basis that the cosmos has a horizon too - the boundary from beyond which light has not had time to reach us in the 13.7-billion-year lifespan of the universe. What's more, work by several string theorists, most notably Juan Maldacena at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, has confirmed that the idea is on the right track. He showed that the physics inside a hypothetical universe with five dimensions and shaped like a Pringle is the same as the physics taking place on the four-dimensional boundary.

According to Hogan, the holographic principle radically changes our picture of space-time. Theoretical physicists have long believed that quantum effects will cause space-time to convulse wildly on the tiniest scales. At this magnification, the fabric of space-time becomes grainy and is ultimately made of tiny units rather like pixels, but a hundred billion billion times smaller than a proton. This distance is known as the Planck length, a mere 10-35 metres. The Planck length is far beyond the reach of any conceivable experiment, so nobody dared dream that the graininess of space-time might be discernable.

That is, not until Hogan realised that the holographic principle changes everything. If space-time is a grainy hologram, then you can think of the universe as a sphere whose outer surface is papered in Planck length-sized squares, each containing one bit of information. The holographic principle says that the amount of information papering the outside must match the number of bits contained inside the volume of the universe.

Since the volume of the spherical universe is much bigger than its outer surface, how could this be true? Hogan realised that in order to have the same number of bits inside the universe as on the boundary, the world inside must be made up of grains bigger than the Planck length. "Or, to put it another way, a holographic universe is blurry," says Hogan.

This is good news for anyone trying to probe the smallest unit of space-time. "Contrary to all expectations, it brings its microscopic quantum structure within reach of current experiments," says Hogan. So while the Planck length is too small for experiments to detect, the holographic "projection" of that graininess could be much, much larger, at around 10-16 metres. "If you lived inside a hologram, you could tell by measuring the blurring," he says.

When Hogan first realised this, he wondered if any experiment might be able to detect the holographic blurriness of space-time. That's where GEO600 comes in.

Gravitational wave detectors like GEO600 are essentially fantastically sensitive rulers. The idea is that if a gravitational wave passes through GEO600, it will alternately stretch space in one direction and squeeze it in another. To measure this, the GEO600 team fires a single laser through a half-silvered mirror called a beam splitter. This divides the light into two beams, which pass down the instrument's 600-metre perpendicular arms and bounce back again. The returning light beams merge together at the beam splitter and create an interference pattern of light and dark regions where the light waves either cancel out or reinforce each other. Any shift in the position of those regions tells you that the relative lengths of the arms has changed.

"The key thing is that such experiments are sensitive to changes in the length of the rulers that are far smaller than the diameter of a proton," says Hogan.

So would they be able to detect a holographic projection of grainy space-time? Of the five gravitational wave detectors around the world, Hogan realised that the Anglo-German GEO600 experiment ought to be the most sensitive to what he had in mind. He predicted that if the experiment's beam splitter is buffeted by the quantum convulsions of space-time, this will show up in its measurements (Physical Review D, vol 77, p 104031). "This random jitter would cause noise in the laser light signal," says Hogan.

In June he sent his prediction to the GEO600 team. "Incredibly, I discovered that the experiment was picking up unexpected noise," says Hogan. GEO600's principal investigator Karsten Danzmann of the Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics in Potsdam, Germany, and also the University of Hanover, admits that the excess noise, with frequencies of between 300 and 1500 hertz, had been bothering the team for a long time. He replied to Hogan and sent him a plot of the noise. "It looked exactly the same as my prediction," says Hogan. "It was as if the beam splitter had an extra sideways jitter."

Incredibly, the experiment was picking up unexpected noise - as if quantum convulsions were causing an extra sideways jitter
No one - including Hogan - is yet claiming that GEO600 has found evidence that we live in a holographic universe. It is far too soon to say. "There could still be a mundane source of the noise," Hogan admits.

Gravitational-wave detectors are extremely sensitive, so those who operate them have to work harder than most to rule out noise. They have to take into account passing clouds, distant traffic, seismological rumbles and many, many other sources that could mask a real signal. "The daily business of improving the sensitivity of these experiments always throws up some excess noise," says Danzmann. "We work to identify its cause, get rid of it and tackle the next source of excess noise." At present there are no clear candidate sources for the noise GEO600 is experiencing. "In this respect I would consider the present situation unpleasant, but not really worrying."

For a while, the GEO600 team thought the noise Hogan was interested in was caused by fluctuations in temperature across the beam splitter. However, the team worked out that this could account for only one-third of the noise at most.

Danzmann says several planned upgrades should improve the sensitivity of GEO600 and eliminate some possible experimental sources of excess noise. "If the noise remains where it is now after these measures, then we have to think again," he says.

If GEO600 really has discovered holographic noise from quantum convulsions of space-time, then it presents a double-edged sword for gravitational wave researchers. One on hand, the noise will handicap their attempts to detect gravitational waves. On the other, it could represent an even more fundamental discovery.

Such a situation would not be unprecedented in physics. Giant detectors built to look for a hypothetical form of radioactivity in which protons decay never found such a thing. Instead, they discovered that neutrinos can change from one type into another - arguably more important because it could tell us how the universe came to be filled with matter and not antimatter (New Scientist, 12 April 2008, p 26).

It would be ironic if an instrument built to detect something as vast as astrophysical sources of gravitational waves inadvertently detected the minuscule graininess of space-time. "Speaking as a fundamental physicist, I see discovering holographic noise as far more interesting," says Hogan.

Small price to pay

Despite the fact that if Hogan is right, and holographic noise will spoil GEO600's ability to detect gravitational waves, Danzmann is upbeat. "Even if it limits GEO600's sensitivity in some frequency range, it would be a price we would be happy to pay in return for the first detection of the graininess of space-time." he says. "You bet we would be pleased. It would be one of the most remarkable discoveries in a long time."

However Danzmann is cautious about Hogan's proposal and believes more theoretical work needs to be done. "It's intriguing," he says. "But it's not really a theory yet, more just an idea." Like many others, Danzmann agrees it is too early to make any definitive claims. "Let's wait and see," he says. "We think it's at least a year too early to get excited."

The longer the puzzle remains, however, the stronger the motivation becomes to build a dedicated instrument to probe holographic noise. John Cramer of the University of Washington in Seattle agrees. It was a "lucky accident" that Hogan's predictions could be connected to the GEO600 experiment, he says. "It seems clear that much better experimental investigations could be mounted if they were focused specifically on the measurement and characterisation of holographic noise and related phenomena."

One possibility, according to Hogan, would be to use a device called an atom interferometer. These operate using the same principle as laser-based detectors but use beams made of ultracold atoms rather than laser light. Because atoms can behave as waves with a much smaller wavelength than light, atom interferometers are significantly smaller and therefore cheaper to build than their gravitational-wave-detector counterparts.

So what would it mean it if holographic noise has been found? Cramer likens it to the discovery of unexpected noise by an antenna at Bell Labs in New Jersey in 1964. That noise turned out to be the cosmic microwave background, the afterglow of the big bang fireball. "Not only did it earn Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson a Nobel prize, but it confirmed the big bang and opened up a whole field of cosmology," says Cramer.

Hogan is more specific. "Forget Quantum of Solace, we would have directly observed the quantum of time," says Hogan. "It's the smallest possible interval of time - the Planck length divided by the speed of light."

More importantly, confirming the holographic principle would be a big help to researchers trying to unite quantum mechanics and Einstein's theory of gravity. Today the most popular approach to quantum gravity is string theory, which researchers hope could describe happenings in the universe at the most fundamental level. But it is not the only show in town. "Holographic space-time is used in certain approaches to quantising gravity that have a strong connection to string theory," says Cramer. "Consequently, some quantum gravity theories might be falsified and others reinforced."

Hogan agrees that if the holographic principle is confirmed, it rules out all approaches to quantum gravity that do not incorporate the holographic principle. Conversely, it would be a boost for those that do - including some derived from string theory and something called matrix theory. "Ultimately, we may have our first indication of how space-time emerges out of quantum theory." As serendipitous discoveries go, it's hard to get more ground-breaking than that.

Check out other weird cosmology features from New Scientist

Marcus Chown is the author of Quantum Theory Cannot Hurt You (Faber, 2008)